Peer Review Process
Peer Review Process
Insolvation follows an editor-led double-blind peer review process for manuscripts that pass initial editorial screening.
- Initial editorial screening: The editorial office checks scope fit, originality, structural readiness, disclosure completeness, and policy compliance.
- Desk decision where necessary: Manuscripts that fall outside scope or fail threshold requirements may be declined without external review.
- Double-blind external review: Suitable submissions are sent for anonymous expert review.
- Editorial decision: The journal may issue a decision of accept, minor revision, major revision, or reject.
- Revision stage: Authors are expected to respond to reviewer and editorial comments clearly and in good faith.
- Final production review: Accepted manuscripts proceed to copyediting, proofing, metadata checks, and publication preparation.
The journal may adjust reviewer number or workflow depth depending on manuscript category, quality, and editorial necessity. Reviewer selection, editorial judgment, and final publication decisions remain at the journal's discretion.
For ethics, disclosure, and post-decision policy context, authors and reviewers should also consult the journal's policy pages.
